HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory19GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 19GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory14.6 GB free of 19 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 19:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4 PRO-7300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 49.9
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 86.1
40% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 58.2
8-Core 63.6
8% 60.9 Pts
64-Core 82.8
5% 82.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
HP(103C 2215) 704MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 253 241 150 66 82 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.7% Average
Read 280
Write 276
Mixed 259
SusWrite 171
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 17.5
79% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 78
DQ Mixed 25
27% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 139%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
879GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 165 164 183 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 154
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 171
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 19GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
1024, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 9 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3006 HP LV2311
Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback