Monster TULPAR T7 V20.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.6
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 15:44
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 67.5
1-Core 198
2-Core 390
112% 218 Pts
4-Core 779
8-Core 1,327
128% 1053 Pts
64-Core 1,946
120% 1,946 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1295) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 29.6
21% 28.5 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 24.2
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU010TZ 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1805 1826 2065 1682 1127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 1973
Mixed 1,192
SusWrite 1,718
356% 1,571 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 74.9
250% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 781
540% 680 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 267%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0823
Typical TULPAR T7 V20.6 Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback