LG 16Z90R-A.ADC8U1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLG 16Z90R-A.ADC8U1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16Z90R
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230203
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 07:46
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 185
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 335
33% 270 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Device(1854 048C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 20.2
18% 22.6 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 31.2
21% 24.2 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X101N 1TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,997
Write 1,492
Mixed 1,524
371% 1,671 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 38.5
131% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 185
150% 218 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 531%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 31.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 29% 14 210 56 144 0" 1280 720 LGD075B
Typical 16Z90R-A.ADC8U1 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: LG 16Z90R-A.ADC8U1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback