Lenovo 83AM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 07:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 53
1-Core 172
2-Core 340
95% 188 Pts
4-Core 677
8-Core 1,284
117% 981 Pts
64-Core 1,600
99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3818) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 62.6
39% 44.6 fps
MRender 20.8
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 74.8
46% 52.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPEYJ1T24MKN2QWY 1TB
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2L06A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1888 1908 1786 2061 2067 2087 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 1,829
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 1,966
358% 1,576 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 27.2
139% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 725
532% 712 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 243%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 38.3
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 31.9
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 14" 1280 720 LEN8AAA
Typical 83AM Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 83AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback