Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409JA
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 05:16
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 42.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 189
60% 113 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 139
28% 193 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.3
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 1.5
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TS256GMTE110S 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 279 284 432 266 334 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,093
Write 750
Mixed 654
SusWrite 319
156% 704 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 13.7
72% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 386
298% 408 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HNA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 16.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 21 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JA_A409JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback