Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 03:16
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 871
87% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 97%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 89.9
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 83
73% 87.4 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 70.7
69% 86.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 473 522 521 518 531 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1775
Write 1,756
Mixed 1,598
SusWrite 633
323% 1,441 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.7
193% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,192
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 1,004
758% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 216%
Great: 300%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
123GB free
Firmware: S3500105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 193 114 50 111 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 435
Write 395
Mixed 373
SusWrite 108
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 21.8
86% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 106
117% 192 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 100%
Colorful CN700 1TB
387GB free
Firmware: H220915a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2758 3082 3068 2138 534 502 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 3,178
Write 2,870
Mixed 2,026
SusWrite 2,014
565% 2,522 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 70.2
243% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 1,019
769% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 197%
This bench: 372%
Great: 499%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 124 124 127 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 139
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 124
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 136 135 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 156
Write 106
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 136
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 86%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
279GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 79 79 81 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 112
Write 102
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 79
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 42
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 33.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 25" 1280 720 MDA0250 EG25SW
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback