MSI MS-158N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 C7VEK
MotherboardMSI MS-158N  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 00:06
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 875
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 660M
MSI(1462 13DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 36.6
15% 27 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 21.2
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1032 1TB
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,385
Write 2,775
Mixed 2,146
614% 2,769 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 68.4
249% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1408
DQ Write 1220
DQ Mixed 1,299
978% 1,309 MB/s
Poor: 259% Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 38.8
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 48.1
SC Mixed 26.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 116%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 3R 5G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 40% 52 203 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-158N Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI MS-158N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback