Acer Nitro AN515-45

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-45  (all builds)
MotherboardCZ Scala_CAS
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 17:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 654
69% 550 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 151E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 48.9
46% 52.5 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 42.2
40% 50.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 480 397 417 416 422 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,566
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 476
275% 1,227 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 53.6
181% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 639
468% 617 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 175%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 29.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical Nitro AN515-45 Builds (Compare 2,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-45

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback