Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X545FJ
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200514
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '24 at 17:41
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10510U 51,080 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 67.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 192 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 39.2 8-Core 396 21% 218 Pts	64-Core 57.6 4% 57.6 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 13EF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 2 2% 3.1 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 10.1 5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 897GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 67 81 69 79 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 77.3 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 71 49% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GB 683 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.5% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 20 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 21.7 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	55	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0046

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X545FJ_R545FJ

CPU
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	27x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	22x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	38x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	11x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	2x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	2x
TM8PS7256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 5,014 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GBMicronBench 49%, 683 samples	27x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	12x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16