Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 148
49% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 334.89
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$145
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 209 174 225 231 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 160
Write 148
Mixed 203
SusWrite 215
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 26.3
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 181
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
661GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 179 149 186 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 200
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 179
113% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 11.4
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 16 75 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0757 EK220Q
Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback