User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 11:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 172
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 672
58% 498 Pts
64-Core 1,998
124% 1,998 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 120
Parallax 139
55% 109 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 133
104% 128 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S660 500GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1671 1669 1734 1318 690 717 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,095
Write 1,817
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 1,300
385% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 46.7
152% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 480
339% 437 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 229%
Great: 406%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 54.5
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 38.6
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 3R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 20% 85 205 57 60 23" 1920 1080 DEL4098 DELL P2314H
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback