CMS 7200-5577A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCMS 7200-5577A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 06:53
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 212
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 622
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 111
Parallax 149
131% 140 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
112% 142 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 54 11 55 105 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 412
Write 288
Mixed 236
SusWrite 69.7
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 15.2
70% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 40.1
46% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
256GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 148 145 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 180
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 145
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 28
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 24" 1280 720 AUS24A9 ASUS VP248QG
Typical 7200-5577A Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: CMS 7200-5577A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback