Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 21:11
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 838
76% 637 Pts
64-Core 1179
73% 1179 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 266
Parallax 185
135% 205 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 184
Splatting 125
119% 147 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 124%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 415 409 417 416 424 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 454
Mixed 432
SusWrite 404
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 46.1
147% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 352
262% 348 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 106%
Great: 132%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
511GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 417 412 419 420 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 464
Mixed 409
SusWrite 406
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 48.6
159% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 355
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 970 1240 1252 1278 1281 1020 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,273
Write 1,278
Mixed 1,309
SusWrite 1,174
284% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 63.6
210% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 482
376% 532 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 213%
Great: 394%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 160 166 162 160 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 217
Mixed 166
SusWrite 161
255% 191 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 2.4
429% 6.4 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.8
389% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback