Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370M DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	10.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '24 at 19:40
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$120 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 234 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 629 70% 549 Pts	64-Core 637 39% 637 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.8% Good	Lighting 85.5 Reflection 115 Parallax 79.9 70% 93.4 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 77.2 Splatting 69.1 67% 84.2 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 94 93 89 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 393 Write 153 Mixed 137 SusWrite 89.1 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 6.9 62% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 11.9 31% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 469GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 105 104 106 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 121 Write 149 Mixed 102 SusWrite 106 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 859B BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 22.7 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 20.5 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
10%	27%	15	197	26	144	23.8"	1280 720	AUS2421 ASUS VG249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	225x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	212x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	151x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	78x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	32x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	29x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16