| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 20 '24 at 19:09 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
84% 151 Pts
|
72% 577 Pts
|
44% 708 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
26% 33.3 fps
|
24% 30.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 158 162 135 143 157 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
96% 134 MB/s
|
138% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
45%
Average
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
57% 70.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | HWP3057 HP P221 |
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,717 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,073x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 933x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 279x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 356x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 297x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 232x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $259 |