Medion S15447

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion S15447  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION M15C
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 14:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 189
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 364
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A006) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9837
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 7.4
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2071 2066 1982 2043 1798 1253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 2,230
Mixed 1,777
SusWrite 1,869
453% 2,010 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 31.3
128% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 52.2
52% 88 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 244%
Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RZX-D4D19M2666BL-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 9% 67 108 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05E5
Typical S15447 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion S15447

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback