Lenovo 83ER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83ER  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 11:50
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 209
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 374
44% 338 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 384A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 14
Parallax 11.1
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 0.5
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512QFM-1BD1AABLA 512GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1002V3LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1446 1527 1615 181 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,619
Write 1,561
Mixed 1,359
SusWrite 822
301% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 37.9
239% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 639
482% 661 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 214%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 26.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9051
Typical 83ER Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83ER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback