TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Zenbook UX3404VC_UX3404VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive512% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Zenbook UX3404VC_UX3404VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX3404VC
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 11:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 54.8
1-Core 179
2-Core 366
100% 200 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 998
110% 869 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 95.6%
 Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 294D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2801
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 65.7
51% 60.7 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 54
Splatting 53.2
41% 49.4 fps
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 47.5%
 Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3521 3444 3504 3496 3489 3503 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
512% Outstanding
Read 2,692
Write 3,364
Mixed 2,988
SusWrite 3,493
710% 3,134 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 118
386% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,761
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,323
1,059% 1,493 MB/s
Poor: 237% ↑
This bench: 512%
 Great: 528%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 49.3
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 48.1
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 130%
 Great: 142%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 120 14.5" 1280 949 SDC416D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Zenbook UX3404VC_UX3404VC Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus Zenbook UX3404VC_UX3404VC

CPU
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples84x
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples3x
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples1x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples64x
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 40%, 204 samples23x
RTX 4070Nvidia  $550Bench 190%, 45,585 samples1x
SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBNvmeBench 258%, 5,218 samples38x
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 243%, 3,424 samples33x
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TBNvmeBench 319%, 208 samples8x
RAM
H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 8x4GBHynixBench 124%, 1,145 samples55x
MT62F2G32D8DR-031 8x4GBMicronBench 133%, 448 samples19x
H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GBHynixBench 118%, 2,587 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback