MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201207
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '24 at 11:09
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160 33,544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 69 1-Core 134 2-Core 265 83% 156 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 687 68% 555 Pts	64-Core 703 44% 703 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 7520) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.8% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 160 Parallax 90.5 86% 119 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 87.7 Splatting 86.4 80% 99.1 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB 1,954 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMKA.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 95 3.1 2.8 3.1 2.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 322 Write 411 Mixed 329 SusWrite 73.7 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 36.4 134% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 168 155% 235 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 165 176 172 177 170 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Read 142 Write 168 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 172 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H3200GST 2x8GB 1,269 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 24.1 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.4 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	32	11	144	27"	1920 1009	LHC2701 42894

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	302x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	222x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	68x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16