Biostar A520MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A520MT  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 09:33
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 310
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 922
94% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.82
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.6% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 36.8
23% 31.8 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 29.3
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$28
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 162 119 79 66 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 472
Write 370
Mixed 344
SusWrite 143
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 37
142% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 214
184% 267 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 91%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 826 825 840 840 837 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,850
Mixed 1,449
SusWrite 954
325% 1,442 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 69.8
249% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1149
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 957
718% 966 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 239%
Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
850GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 94 95 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 81.8
Write 118
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 94.7
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA80-32N220E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 18
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 20.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 192 10 60 27" 1280 720 WAM2700 EdgeartQ2775P
Typical A520MT Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A520MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback