Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 07:49
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 186
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 405
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 NVME 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08425 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,816
Write 1730
Mixed 1,436
370% 1,661 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 56.7
186% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 715
548% 754 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 254%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
38GB free
Firmware: SM30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 102 100 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 91.4
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 101
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2
376% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
29GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 166 168 159 166 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 158
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 164
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 123GB
77GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 4.8 2.7 3.3 8.1 2.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 55.8
Write 6.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.8
17% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G240081 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 19.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback