HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 891E
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240328
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 06:56
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 37.4
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 178
52% 101 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 560
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 891E) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 27
Parallax 25.8
20% 25.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 21.4
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 674 664 571 583 603 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 605
Write 609
Mixed 553
SusWrite 646
136% 603 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 16.7
50% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 373
256% 322 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 361%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4AAG165WB-BCWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 16" 1280 720 BOE09B5
Typical Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: HP Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptop 16-f2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback