Lenovo 81S9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 23:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 171
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 320
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.57 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 9.3
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme NE-256 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 272 288 108 61 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 1,081
Write 792
Mixed 688
SusWrite 176
152% 684 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 15.5
108% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 296
225% 306 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 195%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
762GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 156
Write 91.8
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 100
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Kingston KF426S15IB1/16-SP 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 5 60 15.5" 1920 1080 AUO61ED
Typical 81S9 Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback