Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemPcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte A320M-S2H V2-CF
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 21:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 135
2-Core 261
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 845
81% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1F03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 92.6
Parallax 115
89% 106 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 81
79% 98.5 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PCS 2.5 SSD 1TB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 384 387 346 46 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 475
Write 388
Mixed 343
SusWrite 260
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 22.6
115% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 30.7
80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2400C16K4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 24.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 24
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 60 23.8" 1920 1017 HKC2413 24E4
Typical Amd Am4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Pcspecialist Amd Am4 Gen3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback