Alienware Aurora R15 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 238%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics304% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive395% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora R15 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault 0KDR38
Memory15 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 20:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$480
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 270
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 660
73% 573 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Dell(1028 5107) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
304% Outstanding
Lighting 450
Reflection 551
Parallax 833
366% 611 fps
MRender 477
Gravity 520
Splatting 266
329% 421 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 304%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc801 NVMe SK hynix 2TB
645GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2079 1903 1992 2056 2006 1781 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 3,847
Write 3,601
Mixed 2,893
SusWrite 1,970
690% 3,078 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 84.4
274% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 918
645% 827 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 395%
Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG78AEBUA081N 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 54.2
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 38.2
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 37.4
SC Write 44.9
SC Mixed 40.7
117% 41 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 122%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7256 Odyssey G8
Typical Aurora R15 AMD Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R15 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $2,236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback