Alienware m17 R5 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware m17 R5 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0XV7MX
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 16:08
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 71
43% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 98.2
8-Core 166
16% 132 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Dell(1028 0B5D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.10.24
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.9% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 69.9
21% 43.3 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 45.1
Splatting 26.9
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 35%
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
Dell(1028 0B5D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.10.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 80.6
Parallax 164
50% 102 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 111
Splatting 149
113% 137 fps
Poor: 87%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 122%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv512g NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11304102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 774 763 871 870 891 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,654
Write 1,826
Mixed 1,604
SusWrite 812
332% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 47.5
171% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 199
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 177%
Great: 404%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 21.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 21.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 50 165 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0AE2
Typical m17 R5 AMD Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Alienware m17 R5 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback