Gmktec NucBox K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive461% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGmktec NucBox K6  (all builds)
MotherboardGMKtec GMKtec
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231129
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 06:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 187
2-Core 373
108% 210 Pts
4-Core 735
8-Core 1,383
126% 1,059 Pts
64-Core 1,653
102% 1,653 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 58.2
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 88.8
47% 58.2 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 96.3
56% 64 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Masonsemi SSD 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3440 3422 3324 3151 3103 1620 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 3,488
Write 3,703
Mixed 2,852
SusWrite 3,010
735% 3,263 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 67.7
220% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,779
DQ Write 1,344
DQ Mixed 1,530
1,153% 1,551 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 461%
Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 54.5
MC Mixed 50.8
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 42.6
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 45.5
134% 47 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 142%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 10 128 10 165 34" 2752 1081 SPT8542 Sceptre O34
Typical NucBox K6 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

System: Gmktec NucBox K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback