Asus PRIME H610M-A D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H610M-A D4  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 05:13
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 182
2-Core 331
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 942
101% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,207
75% 1,207 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 38.5
30% 39 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.8
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nx-512 2280 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1.A.1S
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,092
Write 1,365
Mixed 1,146
270% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 45.7
182% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 215
375% 735 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 293%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
30TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 558
Write 299
Mixed 101
232% 319 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5
974% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3200 C18 Series 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 28.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 10% 30 217 57 60 20" 1280 720 SAM0917 S20B350
Typical PRIME H610M-A D4 Builds (Compare 2,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H610M-A D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback