HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 598
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2259 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 39.2
37% 43 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 44.5
Splatting 41.8
41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,446
Write 667
Mixed 445
186% 853 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 47.7
156% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 652
503% 692 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
74GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 142 135 148 145 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 143
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 138
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 107%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
858GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 163 162 161 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 162
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 5 60 24.5" 1280 720 AOC2590 2590G4
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback