Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JB_A509JB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JB
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, ,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210812
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '24 at 15:45
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 12.7 2-Core 19.1 8% 15.9 Pts	4-Core 36.2 8-Core 56.9 6% 46.6 Pts	64-Core 39.9 2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 183F) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 7.7 6% 9.23 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 8.2 8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB 2,132 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 230GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 375 386 378 382 377 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 499 Write 452 Mixed 444 SusWrite 411 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 9.8 32% 9.9 MB/s	DQ Read 49.8 DQ Write 38 DQ Mixed 54 38% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 210%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 1.9 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 390 10% 390 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15F5

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16