Acer Nitro AN515-45

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-45  (all builds)
MotherboardCZ Scala_CAS
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 14:32
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 57
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 118
47% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 418
37% 312 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Acer(1025 151E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.32.15
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 12
Parallax 24.1
7% 15 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 19.7
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1113
Write 1,054
Mixed 1,022
237% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 45.1
149% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 448
333% 443 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical Nitro AN515-45 Builds (Compare 2,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-45

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback