Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics252% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 07:01
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 753
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
PNY(196E 13B1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Lighting 367
Reflection 357
Parallax 389
299% 371 fps
MRender 501
Gravity 314
Splatting 226
270% 347 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 252%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,794
Write 1,896
Mixed 1,145
359% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 45.6
144% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 673
499% 664 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
308GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 440 442 466 464 461 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 453
Mixed 376
SusWrite 450
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 42.3
134% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
2GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 456
Mixed 383
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 44.3
137% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
215GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 472 464 473 471 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 457
Mixed 382
SusWrite 467
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 43.4
139% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
T-force 2TB 2TB
426GB free
Firmware: T0828A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 286 9.4 222 9.4 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 474
Write 423
Mixed 381
SusWrite 158
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 0.5
69% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 0.5
70% 165 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
245GB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 105 104 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 57.6
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 106
16% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 4.7
DQ Mixed 0.3
1% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 18%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 184 174 170 180 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 150
Write 164
Mixed 102
SusWrite 176
202% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
208% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 100 35" 1280 720 AOC3525 AG352UCG
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $657
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback