bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 05:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 648
65% 529 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.5% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 57.4
Parallax 85.9
45% 66.1 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 45.5
47% 58.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 316 298 295 294 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 454
Mixed 393
SusWrite 310
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 40.6
134% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 349
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x3138363620434C31302053657269657300 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 36.6
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 9G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 47% 36 207 57 72 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback