Notebook N9x0TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemNotebook N9x0TC  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N9x0TC
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 19:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 647
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 951D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.3
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 386 390 381 383 386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 369
Mixed 373
SusWrite 386
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 38.2
113% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 243
199% 285 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 121%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU003U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 117 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 126
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 116
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
223% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05C8
Typical N9x0TC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Notebook N9x0TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback