Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 18:55
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 312
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,040
101% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,199
74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 63.7
29% 51.8 fps
MRender 53.4
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 40.7
38% 47.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,721
Write 3,383
Mixed 3,011
682% 3,038 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 104
343% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,152
DQ Mixed 1,255
940% 1,254 MB/s
Poor: 253% Great: 515%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
543GB free
Firmware: HP51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 150
Mixed 87.6
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
51GB free
Firmware: 0209
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.4
Write 41.9
Mixed 25.8
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 54%
USB DISK 3.2 126GB
32GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 105
Write 8.2
Mixed 29.7
43% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
84% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asgard VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 29.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 31.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 75 23.8" 1920 1009 AOC2402 24G2W1G5
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback