Lenovo 82KT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82KT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 18:50
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 48.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 244
73% 141 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 608
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 16
Parallax 19.1
10% 15.9 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 17.4
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S032V Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,782
Write 1,212
Mixed 909
287% 1,301 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 33.5
113% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 302
265% 382 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 244%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
735GB free
Firmware: JU0A2E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.7
Write 114
Mixed 45.8
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
193% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 14" 1280 720 LEN9021
Typical 82KT Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82KT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback