Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A1400EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A1400EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221110
Uptime19 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 13:42
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 194
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 277
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 9.2
8% 10 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 171 116 102 42 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 834
Write 230
Mixed 179
SusWrite 112
73% 339 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 28
140% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 235
192% 281 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE V-GEN D4M8GS32A8 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 12
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 14" 1280 720 BOE07F6
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A1400EA Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_A1400EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback