Acer Swift SF314-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-41  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Strongbow_PK
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 10:39
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 110
42% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 184
18% 150 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1378) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.26
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 10.5
5% 8.37 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.3
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed P8-240G 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0513A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 686 279 198 185 171 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,567
Write 1,222
Mixed 908
SusWrite 281
221% 995 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 22.6
130% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 356
273% 370 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 135%
Great: 222%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
606GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 121 114 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 142
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 116
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
212% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-4GB-2666 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 1R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 18% 61 66 27 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE074C
Typical Swift SF314-41 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback