Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506ICB
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 10:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 1,003
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 16AD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.1% Good
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 100
Parallax 66.6
65% 82.2 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 59
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 961 153 121 126 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,256
Write 1,173
Mixed 1,072
SusWrite 417
220% 980 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 46.2
151% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 602
419% 538 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 145%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FEA Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25.1
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506ICB_FA506ICB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback