Lenovo 82AU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230609
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 23:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 629
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FBD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 46.3
46% 55.5 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 48.9
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,016
Write 222
Mixed 328
113% 522 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 41
153% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 477
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 200
185% 293 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 172%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
332GB free
Firmware: JU0A2E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 67 68 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 55
SusWrite 68.7
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08DF
Typical 82AU Builds (Compare 1,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback