Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 22 days ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170417
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '24 at 20:31
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	61%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR) 12,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 37 1-Core 45.9 2-Core 75.5 31% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 80.8 14% 97.4 Pts	64-Core 82 5% 82 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.8% Good	Lighting 77 Reflection 106 Parallax 70.5 63% 84.6 fps	MRender 94.5 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 53.6 57% 72.3 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK256GVN8 256GB 2,371 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: K8TA4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 96 100 92 113 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.2% Below average	Read 262 Write 219 Mixed 151 SusWrite 106 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 11 40% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 96 DQ Mixed 106 87% 126 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 771GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 98 102 100 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 61.6 SusWrite 97.1 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 16GB 1200, 1200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 7.3 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 5.1 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 0P 0R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	29%	17	130	3	60	24"	1920 1080	ACR03E3 K242HL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	163x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	85x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	104x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	50x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	42x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16