Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory51.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 20:28
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 199
2-Core 407
118% 229 Pts
4-Core 775
8-Core 1,446
133% 1,111 Pts
64-Core 2,796
173% 2,796 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
PowerColor(148C 2407) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 169
Parallax 340
138% 226 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 130
Splatting 200
171% 213 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 139%
Great: 153%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,357
Write 2,254
Mixed 2,248
511% 2,287 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 115
370% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,205
DQ Mixed 1,390
1,042% 1,396 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C36-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
181% Outstanding
MC Read 72.3
MC Write 71.8
MC Mixed 68.4
202% 70.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 35.3
106% 36.9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 2R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 58% 12 210 56 144 34" 2752 1152 DELD12C DELL S3422DWG
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback