Lenovo 83AS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83AS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 19:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 62.8
1-Core 171
2-Core 338
98% 190 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,248
113% 949 Pts
64-Core 1431
89% 1431 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 680M
Legend(17AA 3C3C) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 50.2
Parallax 77.3
34% 56.4 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 25.8
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1418 1394 1232 549 183 272 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1770
Write 1,553
Mixed 1,354
SusWrite 841
309% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 60.5
203% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 761
519% 653 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 212%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 38.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 29.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 120 16" 1280 720 CSO1615
Typical 83AS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback