JW JW-PH67A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardJW JW-PH67A  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120423
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 173
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 338
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 69.8
60% 73.4 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 68.9
57% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 61 70 41 61 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 250
Write 116
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 55
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 17.7
56% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 17
14% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
572GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 168 167 172 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 162
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-464.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 99U5402-464.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 6 60 27" 1280 720 VSC9C30 VP2780 SERIES
Typical JW-PH67A Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: JW JW-PH67A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $208
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback