MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 15:56
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 59.3
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 53.4
32% 47 Pts
4-Core 93.2
8-Core 140
14% 116 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 70
60% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 72
Splatting 68.2
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 178 65 20 25 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 412
Write 322
Mixed 291
SusWrite 110
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 19
68% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 143
108% 146 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
75GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 103 105 103 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 104
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
160GB free
Firmware: FJK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 117 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 100
Write 90.9
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 116
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 0R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 10% 105 189 16 60 23.5" 1280 720 GSM5A53 24M45
Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback