Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 15:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 721
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 723
45% 723 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580
Apple(106B 0161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 80.5
53% 67 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 66
Splatting 41.4
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0128L 121GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS7CA0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,451
Write 754
Mixed 679
211% 961 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 30.2
103% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 483
421% 654 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 195%
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
595GB free
Firmware: AQ03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 137 143 142 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 114
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 142
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D413831475336414652384E2D554820202020 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 24.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.7" 1280 720 APPAE12 iMac
Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback