Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 14:02
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 319
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,022
100% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,421
88% 1,421 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 113
Parallax 151
134% 143 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
114% 144 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 122%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed P8-240G 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S0390
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1124 60 63 68 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 1,340
Mixed 1,158
SusWrite 444
277% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.1
196% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 407
420% 675 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 206%
Great: 222%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
462GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 133 132 135 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 125
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 133
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 27.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 12 60 27.9" 1280 720 BNQ7949 BenQ EL2870U
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback