Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMm-vision Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z390-P
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 19:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 947
79% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,055
65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 81%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,330
Write 1,182
Mixed 940
256% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 68.8
237% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 264
338% 594 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
690GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 141 140 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 169
Write 125
Mixed 122
SusWrite 140
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.6
13% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 172 174 172 173 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 173
Mixed 110
SusWrite 171
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 165 0" 2560 1369
Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback