Asus X510UNR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X510UNR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510UNR
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 17:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 490
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 163E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 373 375 361 329 346 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 423
Write 379
Mixed 292
SusWrite 359
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 28.1
97% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 231
178% 245 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 132%
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 115 105 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 415
Write 335
Mixed 322
SusWrite 143
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 21.6
77% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 200
156% 215 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.4% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 17.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 187 128 60 15.5" 1920 1017 CMN15F5
Typical X510UNR Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UNR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback