Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte B450M DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte B450M DS3H (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 184 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 391 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 37.5 30% 38.2 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 27 27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 115 97 88 86 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 477 Write 206 Mixed 213 SusWrite 105 55% 250 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 32.9 132% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 171 161% 256 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 128%
USB 3.0 super high speed 500GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 197GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 87 87 87 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 78.1 Write 75.1 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 87.8 99% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47 29,751 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 30 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 22.9 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 62: 0P 5R 8G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
62%	49%	53	212	58	144	23.5"	1280 720	ACR0752 XF240Q S

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $88

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	3,598x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	2,698x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	1,086x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	1,286x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	982x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	982x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	671x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	420x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	346x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	930x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	593x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	425x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $436

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16